Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen gezeigt.

Link zu dieser Vergleichsansicht

freiburg [08. 12. 2012 01:11] kItGVdeuri
freiburg [22. 01. 2013 12:04] (aktuell)
admin alte Version wieder hergestellt
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
-If we are to acknowledge that N is a scingfiiant climatic problemthen the enviro-gaia movement will push for mandatory restrictions on fertilizer use. They will follow the same over-reaction as with CO2with targeted pseudo-science, and demands to eliminate use.A more expensive fertilizer ($/lb) would be imposed on the industry due to a perceived threat. The farmer loses the ability to choose the best fertilizer, for his unique operation. The claim of increased efficiency is only theorized.New fertilizers are great for farmers, as long as they can decide for themselves, which to use. Market forces and competition will determine their efficiency.How long before we hear demands for a nitrogen tax? Driving up fuel and fertilizer costs will impact the world population and economy, as well.Does it not strike people as strange, that activists and gaia worshipers have targeted the two most important plant foods   Nitrogen and CO2. I guess that just leaves H2O to scarcify. Btw, adding, N, under climatic cooling will have little effect. Only warmth and fertilizers will increase yields, as it is only required, during vigorous growth. GK+====== Bücher in und zu Freiburg ======